Two Years Jail For Ex-JPSC Chairman In Long-Running Graft Case

The corruption case against former Jharkhand Public Service Commission chairman Dilip Kumar Prasad goes back to the mid-2000s. In 2004, tender irregularities emerged in the procurement of an OMR scanning machine for JPSC. The contract went to SPS International even though another firm had submitted a lower bid. That decision caused approximately ₹13.56 lakh in unjust loss to the state exchequer and raised serious questions about misuse of power.

The Central Bureau of Investigation officially registered RC 6/2013 in 2013 and took over the investigation. The case took years to move forward. The CBI submitted a charge sheet in 2014 after interviewing 34 witnesses. Courts delivered charges in 2018, prosecution testimony continued into mid‑2024, and the defense wrapped up its case in early 2025.

Court Verdict Delivered

On July 26, 2025, a special CBI court in Ranchi convicted Dilip Kumar Prasad along with two directors of SPS International—SK Jain and Sudhir Jain. The court sentenced each of them to two years in prison and imposed a ₹1 lakh fine. Additional six‑month sentences were also assigned for non‑payment of fines. Both jail terms will run concurrently under Sections 120 B and 420 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 13(2) read with 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act.

The court noted that Prasad had manipulated tender conditions to favor SPS International despite their higher bid. The advance payment violated procurement norms. All these actions undermined public trust and betrayed official duty. Following the verdict, the court granted interim bail so that Prasad can appeal the judgment. This marks the first final conviction in the decade‑long JPSC recruitment and procurement scandal.

What Has Happened Since

Since the sentencing, local reactions have been sharp. Civil society activists and aspirants who protested the JPSC’s flawed recruitment processes welcomed the verdict as overdue accountability. They have demanded that all involved officials face justice too. Many pointed out that the scam extended far beyond the processing of a single tender—it represented systemic rot within the recruitment body.

Meanwhile, Dilip Prasad’s legal team has filed an appeal. The bail decision allows him to remain free pending the appeal in a higher court. His lawyers argue that procedural errors and a lack of transparency in the investigation undermine the conviction. They plan to challenge the court’s interpretation and demand a retrial on technical grounds.

The appeal process will determine whether the two‑year sentence is upheld or reduced. If the higher court finds grounds in the defense arguments, the sentence may be altered. Otherwise, Prasad will begin serving time once all legal hurdles are exhausted.

Public interest groups are calling for wider investigations into the JPSC recruitment scam, exploring other tenders and appointments linked to the commission over two decades. They expect criminal prosecutions beyond this one case to ensure comprehensive accountability.

Read more: Punjab Ex-Minister Majithia Awaits Bail as Custody Extends Again